Older patients are less prone to fast decline of renal function: a propensity-matched study.

PURPOSE: Despite CKD is common among older patients, and although factors associated with CKD progression have been explored over decades, little is known about the decline of renal function specifically in older individuals. METHODS: We included adult patients with CKD on conservative management in a propensity-score matched study 1:1 older (> 65 year) and young (≤ 65 yr). Factors associated with the slope of the decline of eGFR such as proteinuria, initial eGFR, diabetes, sex, and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor block (ACEI/ARB) were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were at least two consultations in the service and an initial eGFR lower than 45 ml/min/m2, in the period between January 2012 and December 2017. RESULTS: Crude analysis of eGFR decline shows a slower progression of older patients when compared to younger patients in both absolute change [- 2.0 (- 4.5, - 1.0) vs. -3.0 (- 7.0, - 1.0) ml/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001] and slope of eGFR reduction [- 2.2 (- 4.4, - 1.0) vs. 3.1 (- 6.7, - 1.2)) ml/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001]. Patients considered fast progressors (> 5 ml/min/1.73 m2/year decline in eGFR) were less likely to be older (35.2% young vs. 22.0% older, p < 0.001). Adjusted logistic multivariate regression confirmed that older patients had less odds ratio of eGFR decline, independently of the presence of proteinuria, diabetes, ACEI/ARB use, sex, baseline eGFR, baseline phosphate and baseline 25(OH) vitamin D. CONCLUSION: Older patients present slower CKD progression even after multiple adjustments. This information should be taken into consideration while treating these patients on conservative management and should be kept in mind while planning dialysis start.

Bone mass measurement by DXA should be interpreted with caution in the CKD population with vascular calcification.

BACKGROUND: KDIGO guidelines suggest the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with CKD 3a-5D. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between trabecular bone mass loss and coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression. This study aimed to prospectively investigate the relationship between BMD changes, quantified by DXA, and CAC progression in the non-dialyzed CKD population. METHODS: In this post hoc study, BMD by DXA was measured at the lumbar spine and total hip at baseline and 12-months. Patients were categorized according to BMD changes into 3 different groups: LOSS, UNCHANGED and GAIN. CAC quantification was obtained by multislice computed tomography at baseline and 12-months. RESULTS: 87 patients (55.6 ± 10.7 years, 62% males, 30% diabetic, eGFR = 39.2 ± 18.1 mL/min/1.73m2) were enrolled. CAC was found in 41 (47%) of the patients at baseline and CAC progression in 25 (64%) of them. Considering the lumbar spine and total hip BMD changes together, 24%, 48%, and 25% of the patients were in the LOSS, UNCHANGED and GAIN groups, respectively. Compared to the UNCHANGED or LOSS groups, the GAIN group had an increase in calcium score (p = 0.04) and a higher proportion of patients with CAC progression (p = 0.01). In the logistic regression analysis, CAC progression was 4.5 times more likely to be in the GAIN group. CONCLUSIONS: The association between the increase in BMD values and the progression of vascular calcification was the result of two concomitant processes overlapping, leading to a misinterpretation of DXA results. Thus, the use of DXA for the evaluation of bone mass, especially at the lumbar spine, must be applied with restraint and its results very carefully interpreted in CKD patients.